Archive for the ‘Compare’ Category

Compare 3 Week Yoga Retreat with Piyo

Friday, February 23rd, 2018


Compare what is it?

3 Week Yoga Retreat
A beginner to intermediate yoga program guaranteed to improve your flexibility game.

Piyo
A 60 day workout program designed to be a low-impact routine that doesn’t require weights or any additional equipment. It is advertised as a one-size-fits all type of program, and is said to work for every age and fitness level.

 


Compare what to expect?

3 Week Yoga Retreat
It designed with 3 weeks, with each week progressing to the next level of difficulty: Foundation, Expansion and Progression. Each day has a unique workout so the package includes 21 distinct routines.

Piyo – The aim of this program is to offer an alternative to strenuous workout programs, something that can easily fit into the schedule of most individuals.

 


Compare Exercises

3 Week Yoga Retreat
Core: 30 minutes | Three levels for each section and you move to the next level every week. You will start Core with trainer Vytas then move too Elise for week 2, then Ted (of P90X2) fame for week 3, and finally Faith for the weekends. Vytas will get the ball rolling by easing your inflexible steel joists to help become malleable muscles in the weeks to come. During week two Elise will perform some upward dogs, planks and basic yoga postures. In week Three Ted will aim to increase sill level.

Stretch: The focus is to stretch the whole body from the neck downward. The first two weeks aim at relatively straightforward stretch postures.

Balance: Vytas and Elise aim to spend time with balance postures.

Flow: The concept of Flow is to link together all the workouts of the week.

Flow on the Go: Similar to Flow, except instead of around 30 minutes it is compressed to 20.

Relax: A 3 week workout, this series is led by Faith and consists of low effort yet high relaxation postures with a higher focus on the mental aspects of yoga by helping clear your mind.

Take 10: It features 3 Take 10 workouts with Faith: Abs, AM and PM. Take 10 abs is an easy abdominal workout and is quick to do. The AM and PM workouts are designed to be the weekend quick yoga workouts to keep the flow going. AM is to wake you up and PM to help you sleep better.

 

Piyo
A combination of Pilates, with yoga and fluid movements.

Align – The Fundamentals: It is a 43 minute program that focuses on improving your form and teaching you the basic moves. Chalene focuses on breaking down each move giving you enough time to focus on achieving correct form. It may not feel strenuous first, but you will burn quite a lot of calories.

Define: Lower Body | Just a 20 minute session but this workout is a unique approach to training your legs and lower abs. With a dynamic flow and lots of cool moves you are sure to enjoy this one. Stretching and toning your hamstrings and thighs, the exercises are energizing when compared to traditional moves such as lunges and squats.
As you move through the workouts you will notice that legs are being targeted with almost each move and the core too. It feels like every move contributes to improving core strength.

Define: Upper Body | It is a 19 minute exercise program with numerous moves that target your arms, shoulder, biceps and triceps. Slightly more difficult than the previous one, but considering the length and the modifier included, it’s still a long way away from traditional workouts in terms of intensity.

Sweat: Gives you fast paced cardio yoga moves that come in a staccato sequence for 37 minutes. It features tons of balances work and few postures to focus on as well. It also has a few resistance moves making it a strength training of a different kind.

Drench: – The fat blaster of the program with a duration of 48 minutes and slightly harder than the rest of the pack, it is a pure endurance workout activating every muscle group. An incredible yoga routine, with more advanced moves added. Just keep pushing, and use the modifier if you have to. A subset of these moves will target your core as well.

Sculpt: – This is a 26 minutes exercise program that changes between various tempos. The aim is to focus more on lengthening the muscles, and toning each muscle group separately.

Strength intervals: – 25 minutes long, this workout is somewhat similar to Sculpt and focuses on resistance moves as well. Only light exercises to tone your muscles but it will make you sweat tremendously.

 

What body parts does it target?

3 Week Yoga Retreat – Core, abs

Piyo – Legs, lower abs, hamstrings, thighs, core, arms, shoulders, biceps, and triceps.

 

How hard is it?

3 Week Yoga Retreat – It is not a very difficult workout.

Piyo – It is an easy to do workout.

 

Compare Equipment used

3 Week Yoga Retreat – Yoga Mat

Piyo – None

 

Does it help you lose weight?

3 Week Yoga Retreat and Piyo – Not much.

 

When to expect the results?

3 Week Yoga Retreat – After a couple of months

Piyo – In the first month

 

Compare Schedule

3 Week Yoga Retreat – 21 week workout.

Piyo – 60 day workout program.

 

Is it for women?

3 Week Yoga Retreat and Piyo- Yes

 

Is it suited for skinny people?

3 Week Yoga Retreat and Piyo – Yes

 

Can older people do it?

3 Week Yoga Retreat – Nope

Piyo – Somewhat

 

Calories burned in one session

3 Week Yoga Retreat and Piyo – Not mentioned

 

Age group targeted

3 Week Yoga Retreat – Mostly people below 40 years.

Piyo – All age groups

 


Compare Who is it for?

3 Week Yoga Retreat – It is for beginners and intermediates who want to boost the flexibility game through a yoga program.

Piyo – It is a program that anyone can do without much hustle. It is ideal for those of you who dread cardio workouts, jumping feats, and endless series of push-ups and similar complex moves.

 

Compare Session Duration
3 Week Yoga Retreat – 30 minutes

Piyo – 19 to 43 minutes depending on the workout.

 


Compare Pros and Cons

3 Week Yoga Retreat
Melissa Craig says- “The sequences are easy to complete and I love how varied the moves are”.
Mercedes Houston says- “I’ve completed it without a single workout skipped, and it definitely paid off! Now after completing another month as well (with few missed workouts due to a cold) I feel better, have more energy for pushing extra hard, and my abs are starting to show.”

Claudia Gill writes- “Will go over another session in about a week, so I hope I’ll get the body I was after before New Year’s. So far, I managed to burn 18 pounds. Not following the exact diet, though I borrow some recipes every now and then”.

Compare Echo Plus with Google Home Max & Bose Soundlink

Thursday, February 15th, 2018


Compare What is it? Echo Plus vs Google Home Max vs Bose Soundlink

Echo Plus, Google Home Max, and Bose Soundlink are Bluetooth speakers that can play music wireless and fill up any room with music. These speakers have the ability to accept commands wireless for music playback. They also have provision to perform voice calls if they are connected to a smartphone.

Echo Plus and Google Home Max are smart speakers that can work with various streaming services such as Spotify, Pandora, and more apart from their respective services, Amazon Music and Google Play Music. Both of them have the ability to listen to voice commands and answer questions, provide a weather report, adjust or control the lights inside the house, etc.

Echo Plus comes with a built-in ZigBee hub that allows easy connectivity with smart devices such as lights, locks, plugs, and in-wall switches by top brands such as Philips, Hue, GE, and Yale.

 


What does it do?

These three devices, Echo Plus, Google Home Max, and Bose Soundlink provide hands-free playback of a user’s favorite music. With easy connectivity options using Bluetooth pairing, it can connect to any smart devices for music playback. These speakers are individually designed to provide a 360 degree sound put with high-quality playback at all the frequencies.

Echo Plus and Google Home Max also have voice recognition systems called Alexa and Google Assistant that can help control many functionalities with ease. They can be used to control basic operations of the music, search the internet, book a cab, control lights, and locks.

Bose Soundlink provides a 360 sound in a portable form. Its rugged exterior, higher battery capacity, and water-resistant design make it a perfect go-to speaker for the road.

 


What devices does it control?

These three devices can connect to smart devices that have Bluetooth connectivity. The control is offered using voice commands in form of Alexa in Echo Plus, Google Assistant in Google Home Max, and via Siri or Google Assistant in the Bose Soundlink speaker. The playback of music and volumes are wireless controlled for all three devices. They can also be used to pick calls and answer wireless with the help of built-in microphones that can offer quality conference calls as well. They all come with the ability to pair two or more speakers to create a party-like sound with ease.

Echo Plus and Google Home Max are perfect for controlling various smart devices that can be used to create a smart home. They can control lights, provide information from the internet, and even adjust the temperature of the room. The speakers connected in pairs can be used to play different or same music in all the rooms.

Echo Plus offers Zigbee built-in hub that offers control over multiple devices at scheduled times or with a simple voice command. Users can use it to lock doors and control smart home appliances manufactured by Philips, Hue, GE, Kwikset, and more.

 


Compare Technology: Echo Plus vs Google Home Max vs Bose Soundlink

Echo Plus
This speaker is designed to provide a 360-degree audio experience to fill the room. It has crisp highs and deep bass with the help of a Dolby powered 2.5” downward-firing woofer and a 0.8” tweeter. Echo Plus also has an array of seven microphones that use beam-forming technology to pick up voice commands and cancel noise even in the busiest of environments. The ZigBee Hub is built in the speaker system so that smart devices and appliances can be connected to the speaker easily.

Google Home Max
The sound from Google Home Max is powered by two 4.5” high-excursion dual-voice-coil woofers and two 0.7” custom tweeters. The microphones are designed to capture voice commands even while the sound is blasting through it.

Bose Soundlink
The Bose technology in this speaker ensures that there is deep, loud, and immersive sound with true 360-degree coverage. It can be placed in the center of the room for providing a similar experience to everyone inside or set near a wall to radiate and reflect the sound. Bose Soundlink’s Connect App comes with an intuitive drag-and-drop interface that helps in switching between Bluetooth devices and linking them together for Stereo or Party Mode.

 


Compare Special Features

Echo Plus
Alexa, featured in this speaker uses numerous skills and keeps updating every single day. It can perform quick tasks and even control the smart home with automated group commands. The smart voice service is perfect for even picking up wireless calls and sending text messages on the go.

Google Home Max
This speaker comes with the ability to stand vertically or horizontally. The orientations help in accommodating it anywhere inside the house. The speaker also informs the user if its placed upside down and requires adjustment. It comes with a placement mat that uses magnets to keep the speaker from sliding and vibrating. Users can mute the speaker, disable the always listening feature, and connect it to a USB-C or a wired device via its 3.5 mm port.

Bose Soundlink
This speaker is designed in a tapered cylindrical shape to ensure a better grip for grabbing it. The body of Bose Soundlink is made using durable aluminum material that offers water-resistance. It has a lithium-ion battery that plays music for up to 12 hours. Users can access Siri or Google now from the speaker for basic commands and placing calls.

 


Whats the Difference between them?

Echo Plus and Google Home Max are next-generation speakers that come with Voice Services that perform different tasks on the go. They require an internet connection and listen to wake commands to perform operations such as playing music, searching information, using an app, turnings the lights off, and more. On the other hand, Bose Soundlink is a wireless Bluetooth speaker that offers an immersive sound experience for 12-hours on a single charge.

 


Compare Price: Echo Plus vs Google Home Max vs Bose Soundlink

Echo Plus
$149.99

Google Home Max
$399

Bose Soundlink
$179

 


Compare Warranty: Echo Plus vs Google Home Max vs Bose Soundlink

Echo Plus
1-year limited warranty.

Google Home Max
No information available.

Bose Soundlink
1-year limited warranty.

 


Compare Review: Echo Plus vs Google Home Max vs Bose Soundlink


Echo Plus Pros

Many users have felt that this speaker comes with a good stereo system that provides a decent output for their music. Another advantage of Echo Plus is that it is easy to configure and manage even for the multi-room connectivity. The drop-in feature is perfect for creating an intercom system right at home. Alexa performs all necessary functions very well and the availability of a hub makes it easy to create a smart home.

 


Echo Plus Cons

There have been issues with configuring Alexa with few devices and since it’s still evolving, there has been unexpected errors with its voice commands. Another problem about Echo Plus is that the sound quality of the speakers is not up to the mark and users suggest to connect it to high-quality Bluetooth speakers for a better output.

 


Google Home Max Pros

This speaker offers a decent sound output for all the music. Plus its voice command feature and Google Assistance is quick at searching for information and performing various app based operations. The lights on the front panel look neat and they show the volume level for a quick reference.

 


Google Home Max Cons

Google Home Max consistently fails to activate while using the wake word and it was baffling since it happens when there was no music playing out of it. The speaker switches to mono mode when placed vertically.

 


Bose Soundlink Pros

Bose Soundlink is highly rated for its clear sound and high-quality output at all frequencies. The connection via Bluetooth is easy to setup and the connectivity app works perfectly. Its battery life is also pretty decent and the build quality is also sturdy enough to last long.

 


Bose Soundlink Cons

It has been noted that it loses some bass when the volume is rising and there is no way to adjust it. Also, the mid-frequencies are completely dropped especially while streaming music. The range of Bluetooth devices is also less and can result in frustrating disconnections.

Newa vs Tripollar vs Nuface vs Ziip

Thursday, February 8th, 2018


Compare what is it?

All the four devices, Newa, Tripollar, Nuface and Ziip are advanced handheld electrical skincare devices that are essentially meant to improve the overall texture of the face.

 


Compare what does it do?

Newa stimulates the natural production of collagen and elastin formation which shapes, lifts and supports the skin. This in turn tightens the skin, reduces wrinkles and improves the skin tone.

Tripollar helps shrink skin pores, tightens and renews skin of face and neck to make it look firmer and tighter.

Nuface helps to improve facial contour, skin tone and reduce wrinkles by gently stimulating the large surface areas of the face.

Ziip stimulates the production of stored energy within the cells which repair the damaged skin cells giving a new lease of life to the skin.

 


Compare Technology

Newa
Powered by Endymed’s 3DEEP technology, the device penetrates controlled energy deep within the skin tissue, stimulating the natural production of new healthier collagen and elastin formation. The collagen fibers strengthen and tone the skin while the elastin fibers allow skin flexibility and elasticity.

Tripollar
It utilizes Tri-Polar radio frequency thermal energy to regenerate collagen protein into subcutaneous tissues. The formation of this new collagen helps shrink skin pores making the skin look tighter and firmer.

Nuface
It uses the micro-current facial toning technology that gently stimulates the larger surface of the face to enhance overall appearance. It works by lifting, toning and contouring the face in as little as 5 minutes a day.

Ziip
The technology used in Ziip pushes small energetic vibrations into the skin through positive and negatively charged discs present at the bottom of the device. These Nano currents increase the levels of ATP (stored energy) in the skin and allow cells to communicate with one another and repair themselves.

 


When to expect the results?

Newa
It is recommended to perform a full treatment series 3-5 times a week in a month. After one month, maintenance treatment twice a week.

Tripollar
If one follows the recommended regimen of 12-15 minutes, 2-3 times a week, then results can be seen in 6 to 8 weeks.

Nuface
As directed, on use of 3-5 days a week, results can be seen in as little as 5 minutes.

Ziip
Instant radiance can be seen after first use. Significant results can be seen after about one month, if used 3 times a week.

 


Does it hurt?

Newa
The treatment claims to be completely painless.

Tripollar
No as it is a non-invasive treatment and does not involve any cutting of the skin.

Nuface
No.

Ziip
No information available.

 


What body parts does it treat?

Newa
It has been clinically proven to tighten and lift the jawline, cheeks and crow’s feet.

Tripollar
It tightens and renews skin of face, neck and hands.

Nuface
It is meant to improve the overall facial contour.

Ziip
It addresses all skin concerns.

 


Compare Shelf-life

No information is available for all four Newa, Tripollar, Nuface and Ziip systems.

 


Is it FDA approved?

Newa
Yes.

Tripollar
No information available.

Nuface
Yes.

Ziip
Yes.

 


Is it IPL/ RF or Laser?

Newa
It uses Radio Frequency Technology.

Tripollar
It uses Radio Frequency Technology.

Nuface
It uses micro-current Technology. Please check this page for more information on Micro-current method.

Ziip
It uses Laser Technology

 


How many settings does it have?

Newa
There are three levels of settings, namely 0, 1 and 2. Each treatment lasts for 4 minutes.

Tripollar
No information is available.

Nuface
Once the device is turned on, the appropriate button can be toggled until all of the blue lights are illuminated (Trinity) or set to the far right (mini). This is the optimal micro-current setting for everyone. Intensity can be adjusted for comfort at any time.

Ziip
There are six electrical cocktail treatments available.

 


Statistically how many people are satisfied with the results?

Newa
A majority of them seem to be happy with the device. Almost 50% of the users have provided a positive feedback. They have seen visible improvements over the course of time and they seem to be of the opinion that it is much more economical than a professional treatment.

Tripollar
More than half of the users, about 70% of the users have expressed complete satisfaction. Many of them admit to having received compliments of looking younger. The skin has smoothened and there’s a considerable reduction in wrinkles. Though initially some of them had issues getting used to the technology but with time they seem to have got used to the device and can’t think of replacing it. The customer service as well as delivery was sooner than expected.

Nuface
Almost 60% of the users have come back with a positive nod. Some even claim that there were visible changes after the first use itself. The instructions recommend doing one side of the face and comparing with the other side. The results are remarkably convincing. One has to use regularly for long lasting results. Majority of them said that regular usage has helped revitalize their skin and provided a reasonably noticeable lifting effect.

Ziip
The users are very pleased with the results. Some even claim it to be the best at-home anti-ageing treatment ever. There is a visible glow in the skin and is much firmer. This is true across users with all skin-types and even for those with ultra-sensitive skin. It also takes care of on-set blemishes and pigmentation.

 


Compare Price

Newa
$349.00

Tripollar
$360.00

Nuface
$199.00

Ziip
$495.00

 


Compare Warranty

Newa
60 day Money-back guarantee.

Tripollar
No information is available.

Nuface
Every device includes a 60-day money-back guarantee and a one (1) year warranty covering any manufacturer related problems resulting from everyday use of the device.

Ziip
No information is available.

 


Compare Pros and Cons

Newa Pros
It is an advanced anti-aging skin care device for skin tightening, wrinkle reduction and improved skin texture. By stimulating the production of healthier collagen and elastin formation, it helps strengthen and tone the skin. It is FDA approved and affordable as it equals the cost of two professional facials. Ease of use and comfort within one’s own house.

Newa Cons
Some users have been unable to see any visible changes and consider it to be a waste of money and time. Some complained of a breakout of acne after one month of usage. It stops heating after one year of usage.

Tripollar Pros:
The technology painlessly delivers focused and optimal radio-frequency (RF) energy to the dermis and subcutaneous fat layers resulting in immediate visible results. It is a noninvasive treatment and involves no cutting of the skin. It shrinks pores, regenerates collagen protein, renews skin of face and neck. The skin looks smoother and wrinkles are reduced around the eyes and mouth. The shipping and customer service is real quick.

Tripollar Cons:
It is not a wireless device, uncomfortable to use and burns. There have been complaints of cracks and wrinkles appearing on the face and development of crows feet. It tends to remove volume from the skin thereby letting it sag. It is expensive and does not yield the desired results.

Nuface Pros:
It is a natural and non-invasive facial-lift that uses micro-current technology. Continued use ensures there are visible results that are long-lasting. Clinically-tested for improved facial contour, skin tone and reduced wrinkles in as little as 5 minutes a day. It also targets those tiny hard to reach wrinkles around eyes and lifts the brows as well. It is easy to use in as little as 5-minutes a day. Portable and can be used with ease at home. It is safe and effective for all skin types and ages.

Nuface Cons:
Majority of complaints about Nuface are about it being defective as it stops working after a few days of usage. Similar experience has been noticed about the charger. Other issue users had it with its high asking price.

Ziip Pros:
Improves firmness of jawline and lifts outer corners of the mouth. There is a considerable reduction in under eye dark circles. Inflammation decreases immediately after treatment. A remarkable glow in the skin is visible.

Ziip Cons:
One of the major disadvantage that users have complained about Ziip is that it is very expensive.

Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Saturday, February 3rd, 2018


Compare what is i? Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Coccyx Cushion – It is an ergonomically designed ortho-seat cushion which its makers claim is designed with flawless precision for complete relief from sciatica back pain, tailbone pain, poor posture, improper spine alignment, decreased blood circulation, pinched nerves and several other orthopedic problems.

Donut Cushion – It is an ortho-seat cushion designed like a donut having a hole in the center to ensure the user experiences comfort while sitting. It supposedly provides relief people suffering from problems like hemorrhoids and bed sores besides relief for those who need to be seated for prolonged hours.

 

Coccyx Cushion Review

 

Donut Cushion Review

 


Compare what does it do? Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Coccyx Cushion – It brings relief from sciatica back pain, tailbone pain, poor posture, improper spine alignment, decreased blood circulation, pinched nerves and several other orthopedic problems.

Donut Cushion – It provides the best form of butt donut support for easing painful conditions. It functions as a supportive post-surgery pillow and also provides additional support for the back. In addition to that, Donut Cushion maintains optimum balance between comfort and support needed for immediate relief.

 


Compare Design: Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Coccyx Cushion – It has contour surface design that distributes body weight all through the seat and releases pressure points on tailbone and lumbar.

Donut Cushion – It features unique donut shaped design which creates the perfect seating comfort for the user.

 


Compare Benefits: Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Coccyx Cushion

  • Provides effective relief from backache and pain while sitting.
  • Ergonomic design featuring doctor recommended U shaped cut out that prevents the tailbone from being compressed against the seating surface.
  • Versatile, supports healthy posture.
  • Provides relief in many medical conditions.
  • Non-skid anti-slip bottom.
  • Durable and resilient, stays in desired shape always.
  • Machine washable, provides excellent air circulation.

 

Donut Cushion

  • Claims to be recommended by many doctors and physiotherapists in conditions like hemorrhoids, bed sores, etc.
  • Relieves the user from painfulness and debilitating conditions naturally
  • Lightweight, can be carried anywhere
  • Ergonomic design
  • Provides relief in back pain also
  • Fits almost any chair

 


Compare Features: Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Coccyx Cushion

  • Ergonomic design featuring doctor recommended U shaped cut out
  • Non-skid anti-slip bottom
  • Durable and resilient, stays in desired shape always
  • Machine washable
  • Coccyx comfort space

 

Donut Cushion

  • Features donut hole design and shape recommended by many doctors and physiotherapists
    17.5 inches (44cm) on the longest side positioned to the front of chair with coccyx cut outs on both sides.
  • Measures 14 inches (35cm) front to back
  • 2.5 inches (6cm) thickness
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Ergonomic design
  • Designed to provide relief in back pain also

 


Compare Material: Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion

Coccyx Cushion – The cushion is made of deluxe body active memory foam that is uniform in density and adapts to an individual’s shape. It has a durable mesh cover which is removable and so easy to wash and also features non-skid anti-slip bottom which ensures it stays intact.

Donut Cushion – Its base is made of non-slip material which ensures it stays firmly in place and has a zippered cover that can be removed easily for washing.

 


Compare Specs

Coccyx Cushion – Its dimensions are 17.6 x 3.1 x 13.2 inches

Donut Cushion – 17.5 inches (44cm) on the longest side positioned to the front of chair measures 14 inches (35cm) front to back and has 2.5 inches (6cm) thickness.

 


Compare Weight

Coccyx Cushion – 0.86 kg

Donut Cushion – 0.42 kg

 


Compare Price

Coccyx Cushion – $29.99

Donut Cushion – $29.45

 


Compare Pros and Cons: Coccyx Cushion vs Donut Cushion


Coccyx Cushion Pros

  • Ergonomic design
  • Promotes healthy posture and correct spine alignment
  • Provides effective relief from backache and pain while sitting
  • Increases blood flow to lower extremities.
  • Versatile, supports healthy posture
  • Provides relief in many medical conditions
  • Non-skid anti-slip bottom
  • Doesn’t lose shape
  • Machine washable, provides excellent air circulation

 


Coccyx Cushion Cons

  • Not consistent in providing anti-slip firmness
  • Not big enough for well-built individuals
  • Not too comfortable and soft

 


Donut Cushion Pros

  • Recommended by many doctors and physiotherapists in conditions like hemorrhoids, bed sores, etc.
  • Relieves the user from painfulness and debilitating conditions naturally
  • Lightweight, can be carried anywhere
  • Ergonomic design
  • Provides relief in back pain also
  • Fits almost any chair

 


Donut Cushion Cons

  • Does not feature one-size-fits-all design
  • It’s a bit too hard for older people

Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Thursday, January 25th, 2018


Compare what is it? Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor: It is a revolutionary solution that guarantees the best hinged knee brace support to provide relief and flexibility.

PTEX: It is an advanced kinetic knee sleeve with metal hinge.

McDavid Knee Brace: It is a compression sleeve with side hinges that claims to provides perfect knee support. It also guarantees relief when worn while recovering from injury and even protects from them.

Copperfit: It has presented as the most advanced compression and support series ideal for those who work out and exercise regularly and for athletes.

 


Compare what to expect? Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor: According to the makers of Shock Doctor, wearing this knee brace support shields you from ACL/PCL injuries, medial/lateral instability, hyper-extension, patella instability and meniscus injuries.

PTEX: It has been created with an aim to get relief from sore and fatigued muscles and bruises. It offers maximized protection and comfortable compression support and provides protection from injuries and contusions. Its thermal compression feature increases O2 consumption and raises lactic acid thresholds, which offer relief with muscle and joint movement. It also provides combined therapeutic benefits of kinesiology tape and compression support, boosts blood flow, reduces inflammation and pain.

McDavid Knee Brace: This knee brace promises to address all types of injuries- be it moderate or severe. You may count it for maximum protection from injuries and is even useful for people who’ve had a surgery in recent times.

Copperfit: It has been designed to ensure the wearer gets relief in conditions such as painfulness, muscle stiffness and soreness. Its makers also claim that it heals the muscles faster, boosts circulation as well as oxygenation of working muscles. Copperfit is ideally used to keep muscles strong so care has to be taken to use the right size and proper use.

 


Compare Material: Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor: It is designed with four-way stretch Lycra mesh at the back of the knee. It incorporates air circulation as it is made of vented neoprene.

PTEX: It has been constructed with natural rubber latex.

McDavid Knee Brace: It features latex-free micro-cell structure and neoprene.

Copperfit: It is made of 82% polyester and 14% spandex materials.

 


Compare Features: Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor
• Dual hinged technology for enhanced support and security
• Integrated technology to counter bacteria causing foul odour
• Patent pending X-Fit strap system that cushions leg contours for security and comfort and flexibility in hinge to improve stability during movements
• Provided with bilateral support hinges with hyperextension stops and impact controlling base pads
• Tempered aluminum stability feature to ensure knees stay comfortably and firmly secured within Hypalon sleeves
• Anatomical pre-curved design for better fit and convenience
• Four-way stretch Lycra mesh at the back of knees
• Superior quality stitching assembly, patella support finishing and Lycra binding
• Better finger tabs for easy grip pull
•Latex- free
• N-Tex air flow vented neoprene material
• Designed to address moderate to major ligament sprains, muscle strains and unstable joints
• Fits right and left knees
• Averts ACL/PCL injuries, medial/lateral instability, hyperextension, patella instability and meniscus injuries

PTEX
• Provides relief in conditions like soreness and fatigue in muscles, injuries and contusions
• Thermal compression to raise O2 consumption and lactic acid thresholds
• Offers therapeutic benefits of kinesiology tape and compression support
• Kinetic paneling to improve stability and maximize blood flow and reduce pain and inflammation
• Metal hinge for superior support
• Fits left and right knee
• Includes natural rubber latex
• Not to be used over abrasions and injuries

McDavid Knee Brace
• Side arms provided with independent support of cushioned hyperextension stops
• Lightest hinge constructed with wider arms to enhance stability and support
• Personalized fit with flexible straps
• Latex-Free neoprene for compression and therapeutic heat
• Open 360 degree padded buttress
• Edges with bound to prevent skin irritation
• Perforated back panel to control heat and moisture
• Exterior later of nylon fabric for extra strength and durability
• Available in difference sizes for perfect fit
• Fits left and right knee

Copperfit

• Made from 82% polyester and 14% spandex
• Advanced technology
• Superior quality copper-infused compression sleeves with built-in kinesiology bands for right amount of compression and support
• Well-devised compression for support and relief from pain, stiffness and soreness in muscles
• Boosts circulation and oxygenation of working muscles, reduce swelling and aid faster recovery
• Lightweight
•4-way stretch fabric for flexibility and comfort
•Easy to clean- machine washable
• Moisture-wicking technology to prevent chafing and rashes on skin and to keep affected areas suitably dry
•Built-in kinesiology bands for correct compression delivery and support to knees, ankles and elbows

 


Compare Design: Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor: It features an advanced anatomical pre-curved design; the 875 Ultra Knee Support is fortified with bilateral support hinges and tempered aluminium stays that comfort knees with steadiness and stability. The design of Shock Doctor also includes premium stitching assembly, patella support finishing and Lycra binding that help you perform demanding activities with ease while guaranteeing necessary comfort. In addition to that, it features unique finger tabs that make it easy to grip and pull it smoothly while wearing the Ultra Knee Support on.

PTEX: Designed to assist with sore muscles and bruising, this kinetic sleeve combines the benefits of kinesiology tape into a protective and comfortable compression support. Thermal compression increases O2 consumption, allowing for more efficient muscle and joint movement. Kinetic paneling and metal hinge offer ideal support and comfort through workout.

McDavid Knee Brace:
High Performance Neoprene
Latex-free micro-cell structure provides superior stretch, maximum heat insulation, and lighter, longer-lasting support.
Supports the patella
Open 360˚ padded buttress isolates and supports the patella. Provides moderate medial and lateral support for improving stability.
Lightweight hinge has wide arms to aid in maintaining strength.

Copperfit:
• High-performance copper-infused compression sleeves with built-in kinesiology bands
• Built-in kinesiology bands provide targeted compression and dynamic support
• Comfortable compression helps provide rejuvenating relief and support for everyday aches and pains, muscle stiffness and soreness
• Supports improved circulation and oxygenation of working muscles that reduce swelling and boost recovery

 


Compare Sizes Available: Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor
Three levels of support- Compression, Support-Compression and Stability-Support-Compression
S 12.25″-13.25″
M 13″-14″
L 13.75″-14.75″
XL 14.5″-15.5″
XXL 15.25″-16.25″
Measure Knee circumference- 2 inches below center of knee cap (Patella)

PTEX
M, L and XL

McDavid Knee Brace
Small- 12-14 inches Medium= 14-15 inches Large=15-17 inches XL= 17-20 inches XXL= 20-22 inches

Copperfit
M-15.5-16.5
L-17-19
XL-19.5-21
XXL-21.5-23

 


Compare Price: Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

Shock Doctor: $20.79 – $150.61

PTEX: $49.99

McDavid Knee Brace: $36.99 – $179.03

Copperfit: $10.29 – $25.99

 


Compare REVIEWS: Shock Doctor vs PTEX vs McDavid Knee Brace vs Copperfit

 


Shock Doctor Pros

Customers find Shock Doctor’s slim design, attractive design and well-constructed structure impressive. Shock Doctor is also adjustable above and below the knee. It also has a sturdy hinge that offers great support. Since it is washable, using and maintaining it is all the more easy.

 


Shock Doctor Cons

According to some users, the hinges of Shock Doctor are located in the wrong position due to which they don’t support the knees. Some customers have actually said that it is too bulky, too tight above the knees and difficult to adjust. Its metal fragments also hurt when worn for jogging and running and feels as if blood circulation will stop. Several people have also complained that it doesn’t fit under the pair of jeans as its makers claim it does.

 


McDavid Knee Brace Pros

It is considered to be very good at providing support and stability against medial and lateral forces when worn on the knee. It does a good job of providing sufficient compression also which reduces joint swelling to a large extent. In addition to that, McDavid Knee Brace is also very comfortable to wear.

 


McDavid Knee Brace Cons

Some customers have complained about size issues of McDavid Knee Brace. They say that its design is also not up to the mark. It is also not comfortable to wear as some metal pieces actually poke the skin when it’s worn. McDavid Knee Brace also feels too bulky and irritating on the leg and since adjusting it is not easy, using it feels all the more hassling.

 


Copperfit Pros

Copperfit has won appreciation of many users for affordability and ease of use. It is less expensive, provides relief from pain and inflammation wherever worn and offers desired support. Many users think that the support that Copperfit provides is just unparalleled even though it’s rather thin. it fits easily and can be worn with just about any outfit

 


Copperfit Cons

Irrespective of what the makers of Copperfit say, fact is it offers no compression. It is also extremely tight and makes some customers feel as if their blood circulation in leg would stop. Many have reported irritation and itchiness on skin after wearing it for the first time because of the glue line at its edges. The material Copperfit is made from also appears cheap and emits foul smell even after washing it. Its overall fitting also doesn’t stay for long even though it is tight at the edges. Some wonder why it’s called Copperfit as they haven’t found any element of copper in it.

DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut 2018 Comparison

Tuesday, January 16th, 2018


Compare what does it do? DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut, ScanNCut, and Cricut are cutting machines that are designed for home use to cut simple to intricate designs on a wide variety of materials. These machines can be used on materials such as vinyl, paper, fabric, crafts foam, and more to create personalized stickers, greeting cards, apparels, home décor, etc.

DesignNCut and ScanNCut by Brother come with free cloud-based software that provides access to hundreds of free logos, clip arts, borders, and projects along with step-by-step instructions and videos. Users can create and edit a project on their mobile devices too. The software allows uploading of SVG, DXF (AutoCAD files) and FCM files for use as a cut file. They also can create custom designs by clicking a picture of an image.

ScanNCut comes with a built-in scanner with a 300 DPI resolution that helps in scanning photographs, magazine cutouts, stamped images or hand-drawn designs for cutting. After scanning them, the smart machine automatically creates cut lines and stores the design in its internal memory or an external USB drive. Users have the facility of a touch screen to manipulate and move images right away without the need for a computer or other device. Apart from cutting various materials, it also can be used to cut fabric.

Cricut Explore Air 2 is the latest addition to the cutting series that is two times faster than previous models. It has a unique cutting mechanism that works perfectly for over 100 different materials for making custom DIY projects.

 


Compare Warranty: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

Both DesignNCut and Cricut come with a 1-year limited warranty.

 


Compare Connectivity: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut and ScanNCut are designed with Wireless network capability with 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi connectivity. Users can establish a connection to the DesignNCut machine wirelessly with their Windows and Apple devices. Both machines allow the use of free cloud-based ScanNCut Canvas editing software for customizing their design before cutting. Windows-based machines can also be connected via a USB cable that requires additional purchasing.

Cricut uses Bluetooth feature for connecting to any device wirelessly. It can also be connected via a USB cable for faster file transfer.

All three machines require an active internet connection to perform the required operations.

 


Compare Cutting Force: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut – Approximately 1260 grams force.

ScanNCut – No specific information is available. Instead, this device automatically adjusts the blade extension as per the thickness of the material.

Cricut – It has a one-click Smart Set dial that cuts swiftly and up to 2 times faster than its predecessor Cricut Explore Air.

 


Compare Cutting Speed: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut – Up to 112 MM/s.

ScanNCut – It detects the thickness of the material and adjusts the blade extension for optimal cutting speed.

Cricut – The cut speed varies as per the material, machine setting, and complexity of project design. It does have a Fast Mode setting that is available for cutting vinyl, cardstock, and iron-on.

 


Compare Cutting Area: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut – It provides a cutting area using a standard Mat of 12” x 12” (305 x 305 mm)

ScanNCut – The machine has variable mat sizes for cutting. It offers a cut/draw size up to 11 ¾” x 11 ¾” (296 x 298 mm) when using the 12”x 12” mat and up to 11 ¾” x 23 ¾” (296 x 603 mm) when using the 12”x 24” mat.

Cricut – The Print Then Cut function limits the cut size of this machine furthermore. It offers a size of 5.5” x 8” while using Google Chrome, and 6” x 8.5” for Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari.

 


Compare Scanning Area: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut – This machine comes with a CaptureMat Function that allows the user to capture their image or design via a device and use it as a cut file. The smallest image that it can accommodate is 0.16” x 0.16” (H x W) and the largest image it can cut is up to 11.7” x 11.6” (H x W)

ScanNCut – It is designed with an 11.7” wide scanning and cutting areas to accommodate large DIY projects. It eliminates the need to use a computer with the help of its touchscreen functionality and 300 DPI built-in scanner. It can scan absolutely anything into the machine and save it as a cut file. The cut design can be moved into the desired area and edited using a stylus for a perfect cut. It can save the documents and artworks directly to an external USB or in its internal memory. It has a 12” x 12” and 12” x 24” Scanning area available for use.

 


Compare System Requirements: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

DesignNCut – It supports Windows 7 or later and Mac OS X 10.10 or later. It also is compatible with iOS 9 or above and Android 5 or above mobile device operating systems. Mac users will require creating a wireless access point to use this machine.

ScanNCut – This smart machine doesn’t require connecting to a computer and can be used with its wireless functionality to access its free cloud-based software. The ScanNCut Canvas comes with a host of designs and fonts for easy use. It also allows conversion of supported file formats such as .JPG and .SVG into .FCM format for downloading to a USB drive and uploading to the machine. Even though it can be a little complicated to trace, there is step-by-step tutorial available online for basic understanding.

Cricut – For Windows-based machines, Windows 7 or above OS with a 2.33 GHz, 4 GB RAM, and 50 MB free space is required. For Apple machines, it requires OS v10.9 or later with at least 1.83 GHz processor, 50 MB free space and 4 GB RAM. Both systems should have a 1024 x 768 display resolution, USB port, latest version of Adobe Flash, Internet connection and browsers such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, or Safari. It also supports iOS devices running on iOS 7.1.2 or above.

 


Compare File Compatibility: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut

Both, DesignNCut and ScanNCut machines have the capability to read .SVG file extension and convert custom designs to its proprietary cut file extension using the ScanNCut Canvas software. The versatile software helps in converting most commonly used files into DCM files and is completely free to use upon registration.

Cricut supports uploading and cutting most common design file types such as .JPG, .PNG, .BMP, .GIF, .SVG, and .DXF files.
Price

DesignNCut -$ 179.95

ScanNCut – $ 294.99

Cricut – $ 249.00

 


Compare Reviews: DesignNCut vs ScanNCut vs Cricut


DesignNCut REVIEW

Penny White, a DesignNCut reviewer reveals that the Wi-Fi connectivity on the machine keeps dropping continuously and requires restarting the project all over again. She was frustrated since there is no USB connectivity with a Mac either. She disappointingly writes that she is in the process of returning the machine.

Another customer, Lucy McBride claims in her DesignNCut review that the machine is difficult to use due to lack of proper instructions. There are some steps where they have just substituted ScanNCut or DesignNCut that can be confusing and not compatible.

A DesignNCut review by Krista Lane asserts that the machine so far works well for her but there is no way to pause it to switch the pen colors to a design.

Dean Morrison warns in his review that some devices don’t work well with the mat capture feature. Users need to take pictures of the calibration and hold the device in the right position. He couldn’t get a clear background and the dots meant for cutting were blurred in each of his three attempts.

 


ScanNCut REVIEW

A customer, Stella Patton complains in her review that ScanNCut’s wireless capabilities don’t support networks that use WPA fixed-length passwords. Their solution is to re-program the router and change the network key with the new but less-secured key. This makes it a waste of money for money homes that use such encryption to secure their Wi-Fi internet from being misused.

Ronald Hamilton’s review of ScanNCut discloses that users need to purchase an activation card along with the machine that adds to its cost.

Neil Anderson, a ScanNCut customer criticizes the machine in his review as it didn’t work well for him. The machine couldn’t work well at cutting custom stickers and ended up having to do corrections manually. He couldn’t get a solid cut even after adjusting the blade and settings several times.

A similar complaint is seen in Patti Mitchell’s review that ScanNCut sometimes works fine but sometimes cannot get the details right, especially for custom designs.

One Alan Warner states in his ScanNCut review that its mat doesn’t stay sticky and is difficult to keep it clean. Another issue with the machine is that it doesn’t work well with custom design due to lack of clean cuts.

A review of ScanNCut by Belinda Newton also highlights the issue with the mat that loses stickiness very quickly and is highly expensive to replace. She does say that the machine did a great job for her at cutting vinyl stickers that would take up a lot of time if done manually.

Eunice Ruiz claims in her ScanNCut review that the machine is better at cutting but the mat might lose its stickiness soon and make the paper move over it. She also shows disappointment at the fact that the machine doesn’t come with a better set of instructions on how to use all of its capabilities.

 


Cricut REVIEW

Madeline Cruz, a Cricut customer criticizes the lack of an installable software that comes with it. Also, she noticed that Cricut has locked out all 3rd-party software vendors from working with its machine. This forces the user to only use its online software that is limited in terms of capabilities.

Another customer, Shelly Jennings found that Cricut’s design space only works on her iPad and there is no way it can be used on other devices. She also had wireless connectivity issues that their tech support failed to help with.

A similar issue is mentioned in Paul West’s Cricut review. He also couldn’t get the machine working using multiple OS systems and applications. Also, the tech support couldn’t help him with his problem.

As per Beverly Williamson, Cricut comes with only an online version and can only print/cut a small 6.25” x 8” design. He warns that people might find it difficult to work with its plugins since she struggled with 3 different browsers to get a single project done.

Austin Ortiz’s Cricut review warns that the online software tends to convert the images into low resolution and the printed piece isn’t as good as the one uploaded. Also, he reveals that it takes a lot of time to finish a simple job. The lack of instructions and a basic tool kit makes it even more difficult to use this machine.

According to Clay Lee’s Cricut review, the machine is pretty expensive and requires a lot of hard work from the user’s end. He had to learn using it through YouTube videos and still found it difficult to create his own custom designs.

One other review by Hattie Walters states that Cricut is impossible to use without an internet connection and is a little complex when it comes to syncing. She does give it a good rating for cutting vinyl very well.

Helen Stewart hates the fact that Cricut doesn’t support Arabic language. She also found the loading mechanism tedious since she had to press many times to load the paper and cut. It would have been great if there was a way to automate the process.

Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

Tuesday, January 9th, 2018


Compare what is it good for? Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

All three Vitamix blenders, V1200, 7500, and A3500 are designed to provide a healthy, whole-food recipes right at home. These powerful blenders come in large 64-ounce containers that can be used to blend medium to large batches suitable for a whole family. These blenders come with variable speed control that helps in adjusting the speed and allows the user to refine every texture with high precision. The Pulse feature helps in adding a layer of coarse chops over smooth purees to prepare recipes such as chunky salsa and thick vegetable soups.

Vitamix V1200 and A3500, both come with built-in wireless connectivity that helps their motor bases to read and automatically adjust the programs as per the container size. They also have built-in timers that help in avoiding over-processing of blends and achieve a perfect texture every single time.

Vitamix A3500 comes with five program settings – Smoothies, Hot Soups, Dips & Spreads, Frozen Desserts, and Self-Cleaning. It also features a touch interface for easy selection.

 


Compare Power: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

Both Vitamix V1200 and A3500 have a 2.2-peak horsepower with 120 V, 50-60 Hz, 12 Amps rating.

The Vitamix 7500 has 2 horsepower motor.

 


Compare RPM: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

Vitamix V1200 – No information available.

Vitamix 7500 – 22,700 RPM

Vitamix A3500 – No information available

 




Compare Safety Feature: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

Both, Vitamix V1200 and A3500 have self-detecting mechanism that automatically detects the blending bowl or cup size to make smaller batches and easily store or take to go. The A3500 also changes the program selection as per the detected container and automatically stops the program once the blending is performed.

Vitamix 7500 comes with a radial cooling fan and thermal protection system that cuts off the power in case of overheating.

 


Compare Speed Controls: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

All three Vitamix blenders, V1200, 7500, and A3500 have 10 variable speed settings to select from to fine-tune every texture of the ingredients. Each of them also has a pulse feature that helps in layering coarse chops over smooth purees for recipes such as thick vegetable soups, chunky salsas, and more.

Apart from these controls, A3500 also comes with five programs that are designed to make various recipes at the touch of a button.

 


Compare Special Features: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

Vitamix V1200

The Vitamix V1200, 7500, and A3500, all three blenders are designed to offer 10 Variable Speed Controls and a Pulse feature that helps in creating smooth to coarse recipes quickly and easily. The 64-ounce containers are perfect for blending medium to large batches for an entire family. Each of them come with a high-quality design and a powerful blade assembly that can cut through literally all types of ingredients with ease.

The V1200 and A3500 blenders by Vitamix also comprises of a built-in wireless connectivity feature that automatically adjusts the blending time as per the container used. This helps in ensuring that the food is blended in the perfect proportion every single time. Both these blenders comprise a built-in digital timer that helps in avoiding over processing of food items. The V1200 comes with a 20-ounce Self-Detect blending cup and 8-ounce bowl for preparing smaller batches for storage or for taking to go. It also offers Bluetooth connectivity for operating the system via an Android or Apple device. The A3500 also switches the available programs as per the container used.

A3500 by Vitamix comes with a touch-screen control that allows customization and selection on the go. It comes with five program settings – smoothies, hot soups, dips and spreads, frozen desserts, and self-cleaning. The blender is designed to store easily with the help of its under-cabinet profile that fits every kitchen size.

Vitamix’s 7500 is designed with a 2.2 HP motor along with aircraft-grade, hardened stainless steel blades to offer the best smoothies possible. The powerful motor maintains its torque while staying cool while processing the toughest of ingredients with ease.

 


Compare Pitcher: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

The Vitamix V1200, 7500, and A3500 come with a 64-ounce container.

 


Compare how to clean it? Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

These three blenders, Vitamix V1200, 7500, and A3500 come with a self-cleaning cycle where users can put a drop of liquid soap and warm soapy water and run it for 30 to 60 seconds. Later it can be simply wiped with a dry, soft cloth. The motor base of each blender can be easily wiped clean using a damp cloth.

The V1200 model does offer a chance to place the container and some parts to be placed in the dishwasher for an easy cleaning cycle. But care should be taken to not remove the retainer nut and blade assembly from the container.

 


Does it crush ice?

Yes, they all can crush ice.

 


Does it cook soup?

Yes, Vitamix V1200, 7500, and A3500 can cook soup.

 


Does it work as a food processor?

Yes, they can.

 


Does it make smoothies?

Yes, all three of them can.

 


Does it grind coffee?

Yes, all three can grind.

 


Does it make juice?

Yes, all three can.

 


Does it blend nuts?

Yes, the blade assembly for all three Vitamix blenders V1200, 7500, and A3500 can blend nuts with ease.

 




Compare Price: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

Vitamix V1200 – $629.95

Vitamix 7500 – $479.99

Vitamix A3500 – $549.95

 


Compare Warranty: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500

These blenders, V1200, 7500, and A3500 by Vitamix offer up to 10 years of warranty.

 


Compare Reviews: Vitamix V1200 vs 7500 vs A3500


Vitamix V1200 REVIEW

Kathleen Frank, a Vitamix V1200 reviewer reveals that her Bluetooth connectivity didn’t work at all with any Android or Apple device. She was highly disappointed since it was one of the real reasons she was inclined towards purchasing it. The Costco representative that helped her also failed to connect with the display model with the devices.

A similar complain surfaces in Anne Long’s review of Vitamix V1200 where she couldn’t get any response from customer support regarding the issue for over a week.

A reviewer, Mack Moore says that Vitamix V1200 is highly expensive and for something, at its cost, it doesn’t come with any type of preset controls. Also, it doesn’t include a Dry Grains container and is required to purchase it separately. He mentions that for the price and comparison sake, the Ascent models are known to be silent over V1200.

 


Vitamix 7500 REVIEW

One customer, Felix Blair, discloses that the orange gasket that is placed under the container is designed only to dampen the vibrations of the motor. It doesn’t have a provision to seal out the liquid that can leak into the motor and damage it over multiple uses.

A customer, Monique Jackson states in her Vitamix 7500 review that she noticed tiny black specks on her smoothies and upon researching it seems like these are Teflon particles. She warns other users that such particles can be harmful to the body and might get into their drinks unnoticed.

Krystal Lee exposes that her 7500 doesn’t do its job well and blends only the easiest of ingredients. When it comes to some hard or sticky, it simply tries to blend it and shuts off automatically without giving a smooth output.

A 7500 review by Luz Wagner complains that all Vitamix models including 7500 collects liquid under the container and is a mess to clean up. The review further adds that the blender makes the same amount of noise in the lowest and highest settings and there was no difference in how it ran in the pulse mode too.

One Claudia Mason shows disappointment in her 7500 reviews since her blender broke after 8th use and she had barely used it. The motor froze and let out electrical smell after using the pulse mode. She expected a better quality from Vitamix and calls it a waste of money.

Another review by Saara Reese reveals that the container accompanied with 7500 is too large for making single-serving batches. Also, there is too much room on the side of the blades and as a result food gets accumulated there and doesn’t blend well.

Pam Larson, an annoyed customer pans 7500 as a poorly built blender. Her start and stop switch didn’t seem to be secure and at times she had to pull the cord out completely to turn it off. She found its quality to be cheap and flimsy along with the quality of plastic container. The review continues to reveal that 7500 generates a slight electrical smell even after a light-duty operation and doesn’t make smooth pulps or even textured batter.

A reviewer, Ed Parsons criticizes 7500 asserting that the blender leaves the large chunk of fruits inside without blending it well. He also felt a chemical-like taste in the soups that were created using the blender. He further adds in his Vitamix 7500 review that this expensive blender lacks measurement markings on the container for a better visibility and moves around a lot on the counter while blending. Overall he is disappointed due to its ineffectiveness at even handling small amounts of liquid and the price that it comes for.

 


Vitamix A3500 REVIEW

According to Margie Jimenez, a Vitamix A3500 user, the model comes only with one size and is not suitable for all types of serving sizes. She reveals that the containers from other Vitamix models will not work with A3500 unless they have NFC tags on it. Such an advanced design also makes the blender costlier over other blenders in the Ascent Series.

One Marty Todd states in his review that A3500 lacks a solid feel since the turning the dials barely give a noticeable click. This might be dangerous since it can be easily turned up or down with the slightest of accidental touch.

Beverly Quinn discloses that the power rocker switch on the A3500 is made of cheap hollow plastic material and doesn’t fit properly on the unit. She also mentions that the blender is noisier than advertised.

Kim Morris’s review questions the manufacturing quality of A3500 since she found that the blender would overheat while blending an official recipe that uses the preset blend cycle. Also, she suspects that her model wasn’t working well since it doesn’t cut off the power automatically when the motor overheats. Her Vitamix A3500 struggled to make smoothies as it ramped up to a 10 setting on its own and got stuck during the blending cycle.

Another review of Vitamix A3500 by Samuel Cross claims that the cup on the blender has twisted itself off twice while running. It spilled liquid all over the kitchen and exposed the dangerous blade. He warns other users to be careful while using the blender that seems to have a serious manufacturing issue.

As per the A3500 review by Gayle Bennett, the large 64-ounce container is not good for smaller batches and anything that is blended in small quantities will simply not work. Her another issue highlighted in the review is the lack of backlit buttons that make it hard to select the right option in low light or under the glare of bright light.

Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Monday, December 11th, 2017


Compare what is it good for? Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
1. Huge 64 oz. carafe with ergonomic design that facilitates smooth blending
2. Commercial-certified machine ideal for both professional and home use featuring powerful 2.5 HP and 30, 000 rpm motor
3. Features easy-pour sprout and ergonomically shaped handle
4. Processes ice, frozen fruits, leafy greens and other ingredients effortlessly
5. Advanced vacuum technology features to displace excess air before blending along with handheld vacuum pump to prevent oxidization
6. Exceptionally efficient stainless steel utility scoop
7. Monitors temperature levels
8. 15-year warranty for household use and 3-year warranty for commercial use
9. Dedicated customer service support

 

Vitamix Ascent A2300

1. Three program settings (for smoothies, hot soups and frozen desserts) that automatically adjust to the container size, processes ingredients smoothly and stop the blender when processing is over
2. Built-in wireless connectivity equips it with latest advancements and functions for years.
3. Variable speed control and pulse feature lends finest texture of any recipe.
4. Versatile motor base that reads the container size selected and automatically adjusts program settings and maximum duration for automatic blending.
5. Built-in digital timer
6. Can be paired with any self-detect containers and to achieve a customized blending system

 


Compare Power: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
2.5 HP

Vitamix Ascent A2300
2.2 HP

 


Compare Blades: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
Integrated 4-spoke blending blade

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Standard for Vitamix Ascent A2300 blades fixed in container

 


Compare RPM: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
30,000 rpm

Vitamix Ascent A2300
24,000 rpm

 


Compare Safety Feature: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
1. Thermochromatic ink raw-temperature indicator to determine the exact status of temperature of blends by changing in colour from blue to white when temperature exceeds 118°F (47.7°C). This feature is ideal for raw food diets and for monitoring high temperature levels associated with high-speed blending.

2. Automatic Overload Protection
SSecial inbuilt feature, viz., Automatic Overload Protection, protects the motor and prevents overheating. It also gets the motor to shut and can emit a light odor to indicate overload.

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Not applicable

 


Compare Speed Controls: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
1. Variable Speed Dial and Start/ Pause Switch
Manual timer mode

2. Blend Preset Button:
Press the Blend Preset Button for automatic blending for 30 seconds duration.

Pulse Preset Button Press
It pulses ingredients automatically in 30 seconds.

Combo Preset Button
Press the Combo Preset Button to automatically pulse three times before blending for 30 seconds.

Each time the above buttons are pressed, 30 seconds will be added to the total time of of their respective functioning. Also, the timer will resume 00:00 when their start/pause knobs are pressed.

 

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Variable Speed Dial function offers manual control ranging from Variable 1 (slowest speed) to 10 (highest speed). Variable speed also shuts the blender automatically after 6 ½ minutes in case the start/stop switch is not pressed.

 


Compare Special Features: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
1. Vacuum to seal ingredients tightly prior to blending
2. Two vacuum pumps- electric or hand pumped supplied
3. 2.5 HP power
4. Manual, Timer and Automatic ‘one touch’ control functions
5. Backlit LCD display
6. Metal on metal blade drive coupling for enhanced durability
7. Stainless steel scoop that also functions as a tamper/ smoothie stick
8. ‘Raw Temperature’ indicator
9. Discreet ventilation design
10. Sophisticated integrated 4-spoke blending blade

 

Vitamix Ascent A2300
1. Equipped with Variable Speed Control and Pulse
2. Easy to adjust as per texture required for every recipe
3. Built-in wireless connectivity
4. Built-in digital timer for perfect texture
5. Variable Speed Control
6. Versatile pulse feature to layer coarse chops over smooth purées
7. Motor base that automatically adjusts blending times as per container size
8. Compatible with all SELF-DETECT™ containers

 


Compare Pitcher: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
Large, ergonomic 64 oz. carafe

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Low-profile container measuring 64-ounce

 


Compare how to clean: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
Main body
1. Wipe the outer body with a damp, soft cloth or sponge dipped in a mild liquid detergent and warm water.
2. For deep cleaning, remove the centering pad of the appliance.
3. Clean the switches properly and the grooves around them with a cotton swab dipped in mild detergent. (Important: Do not keep the motor base in water).
4. Wipe the body dry with a soft cloth.

 

Container
1. Fill the container partly with warm water and some liquid dish washing detergent.
2. Bring the lid into locked position. Manual Speed procedure can also be selected for the same.
(Note: Don’t let water enter the main body, avoid using harsh chemicals and bleach and protect every component from accidental damage.)

 

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Container
To Clean:
1. Fill the container partially with warm water and add dishwashing liquid.
2. Snap or push the complete 2-part lid into the locked position.
3. Press the Start /Stop button and increase the variable speed to 10 slowly.
4. Run the machine for 30 to 60 seconds.
5. Rotate the Variable Speed dial back to Variable 1. Press Start/ Stop.
6. Rinse and drain all pieces.

Blender Base
1. Clean the outside surface with a damp, soft cloth or sponge dipped in mild dish soap and warm water. (The blender base is not to be placed in water. Dishwasher-safe centering pad can be removed for more thorough cleaning).
2. Polish and dry all surfaces with a soft cloth.
3. Dishwasher safe lids, lid plug, centering pad and tamper can also be washed with warm water.

 


Does it crush ice?

Dynapro Blender
Yes

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Yes

 


Does it cook soup?

Dynapro Blender
Yes

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Yes

 


Does it work as a food processor and make smoothies?

Dynapro Blender
Yes

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Yes

 


Does it grind coffee?

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Yes

 


Does it make juice?

Dynapro Blender
Yes

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Yes

 


Does it blend nuts?

Vitamix Ascent A2300
Yes

 


Compare Price: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
$599.95

Vitamix Ascent A2300
$399.95

 


Compare Warranty: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix

Dynapro Blender
3-Year warranty for commercial use and 15-year warranty for household use

Vitamix Ascent A2300
10-year full warranty

 


Compare Pros and Cons: Dynapro Blender vs Vitamix


Dynapro Blender Pros

1. Sophisticated vacuum blending
2. Raw Temperature Indicator feature
3. Removes undesired air in the container, features vacuum blending
4. Large 64-oz BPA-free container
5. 2.5 HP motor certified for both home and commercial use
6. Powerful motor and 4-spoke blending blade.
7. Three modes of operation (Manual Operation, Countdown Timer, and 3 One-Touch Preset Buttons)

 


Dynapro Blender Cons

1. Heavier and loud (like other blenders)
2. Longer preparation time as air has to be first pumped out from the blending container. (With battery-operated vacuum pump it takes about 30 seconds to remove air).
3. Adding ingredients midway removes the vacuum
4. Rather expensive

 


Vitamix Ascent A2300 Pros

1. Well-designed, superior quality machine
2. Comes with a wireless motor base so it can be easily moved around and used anywhere
3. Built-in wireless connectivity
4. Sophisticated digital timer
5. Perfectly compatible with all self-detect containers
6. Up to 10 variable speed controls
7. Simple and uncomplicated pulse feature

 


Vitamix Ascent A2300 Cons

1. On the expensive side
2. Lacks compatibility with Legacy and S-series product lines
3. Self-detect Ascent A2300 containers cost extra.

Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Saturday, December 9th, 2017


Compare what is it? Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex, Shark IONFlex 2X, Dyson V8, Dyson V6, and Dyson V7 are all lightweight, cordless vacuum cleaners that offer convenient cleaning of dust, dirt, and pet hair around the house. They come with a smart design that makes them usable as an upright vacuum or gets handheld for flexibility in cleaning. All these vacuums come with various attachments that serve distinct purposes to suit most cleaning requirements in a household.

Both Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X are equipped with the benefits of DuoClean Technology. It houses a combination of a bristle brush and a soft roller that is invented to clean fine dust and small or large particles on both floors and carpets. The MultiFLEX technology in the vacuum folds them easily so that it can be used as a handheld cleaner to reach under beds, couches, and tables. Also, its Smart Response Technology offers a range of performance-enhancing power settings that can be used to match the cleaning requirements of carpets and floors. Both these vacuums house a powerful rechargeable ION Power Pack lithium-ion battery with a variety of charging options.

Dyson V8, Dyson V6, and Dyson V7 each are powered by Dyson digital motor that uses advanced technology to pick dirt, dust, and debris in a single pass. The power-dense motor utilizes the digital pulse technology and a neodymium magnet that spins up to 110,000 times a minute or more depending on the version of the vacuum. The attachments on each of these vacuum cleaners are easy to attach and detach and turns into a powerful handheld vacuum from a full upright vacuum cleaner in just seconds. The V7 and V8 feature a Motorized Floor Tool that can be used to clean carpets or hard floors when it is being used in the handheld mode.

 


Compare what surfaces does it clean? Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

All of these vacuum cleaners, Shark IONFlex, Shark IONFlex 2X, Dyson V8, Dyson V6, and Dyson V7 are designed to clean various types of hard floors, bare floors, hardwood floors, and carpets.

Dyson V8, V6, and V7 have stiff nylon bristles that help in removing pet hair and ground-in dirt from car seats, tight spaces and even furniture. Its direct-drive cleaner head pushes the bristles deeper into carpets to remove deep-seated dirt from its surface.

 


Compare Cleaning Modes: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Dyson V8 and Dyson V7 both have a Direct-Drive cleaner head that pushes the bristles deep into the carpet in order to remove the grounded dirt within. The V8 also features a soft cleaner head that can remove large debris and dust at the same time from hardwood floors.

Dyson V6 features a motorized head that works on all types of surfaces and can be put on a Max Power mode to get a higher suction power out of the concentrated areas of dirt.

All three of these vacuums can transform into an upright vacuum that is both lightweight and well-balanced for the floor to ceiling cleaning. It can easily clean up, top, down low, and in-between. It also converts to a cord-free handheld vacuum that can easily pick up dirt, dust, pet hair, and debris form spots and hard-to-reach areas.

 


Compare Cleaning Path: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X have an 11.9” Vacuum cleaning path width while the Dyson V6, Dyson V7, and Dyson V8 cleaning path depends on the user.

 


Compare Technology: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X, both have a DuoClean Technology that hires a bristle brush to deep clean carpets and hosts a soft brushroll to pull in larger particles and directly engage the floor to give them a shiny, clean look. The MultiFLEX Technology that allows it to flexibly reach under furniture and storage units with ease. They also have a Smart Response Technology that enhances its performance to suit the type of floor or carpet to be cleaned.

All the Dyson vacuums, V6, V7, and V8, have 2-Tier Radial cyclone technology that picks up dust, dirt, and pet hair quickly and easily in a single pass.


 


Compare Cleaning Brushroll: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Dyson V6 hosts a Motorized cleaner head while Dyson V8 and V7 both have a Direct-Drive cleaner head that has 75% more brush bar power than the V6. Dyson V8 also has a soft roller cleaner head to pick up dust while it vacuums the hardwood floors.

Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X have a bristle brush that deep cleans carpets. There is an additional soft brush roll that pulls in the larger particles while engaging the floor to provide optimal cleaning results.

 


Compare Battery: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X come with a rechargeable, removable ION Power Pack Lithium-Ion battery. The Shark IONFlex 2X comes with two 25.2 V batteries so users can vacuum while the second battery is charging.

Dyson V6 comes with a Nickel-Cobalt Manganese battery while both Dyson V8 and Dyson V7 have a comparatively long-lasting Lithium-Ion battery.

 


Compare Charging Time: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

The ION Power Packs in Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X take approximately 3.5 hours to fully charge.

The Dyson V8 takes about 5 hours, the V6 takes about 3.5 hours, and the V7 takes approximately 5.5 hours to recharge completely.

 


Compare Runtime: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Based on a new battery’s 100% capacity, Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X, both have Max Power setting in Hand vacuum mode that lasts for 11 minutes and Extends Runtime setting that vacuums for approximately 23 minutes. During the floor mode, the vacuum can go for 12 minutes in Max Power setting and 20 minutes in Extend Runtime setting. The Carpet Mode provides a runtime of approximately 11 minutes in Max Power and 14 minutes in Extend Runtime setting.

Dyson V8 can function up to 40 minutes in a fade-free suction mode and can last up to 25 minutes with the motorized floor tool attachment. Dyson V6 lasts for up to 20 minutes and Dyson V7 can run for approximately 30 minutes of cleaning cycle.


Is it cordless?

Yes, all five of these vacuums feature rechargeable batteries that make them cordless.

 


Compare Headlight: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X have LED headlights that are bright enough to illuminate the dirt and dust in the path for a thorough cleaning. It also conserves energy when compared to the lights available in standard vacuum cleaners. There are no headlights available in all of the Dyson V8, V6, and V7 models.

 


Compare Suction Power: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Dyson V8 – 115 AW

Dyson V6 – 100 AW

Dyson V7 – 100 AW


Does it convert to hand vac?

All the five vacuum cleaners, Shark IONFlex, Shark IONFlex 2X, Dyson V8, Dyson V6, and Dyson V7 can convert to handheld vacuum cleaners and come with a number of attachments to help with the various type of cleaning chores.

 


Compare Price: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex – $ 269.99

Shark IONFlex 2X – $ 359.70

Dyson V8 – $ 448

Dyson V6 – $ 249.99

Dyson V7 – $ 299

 


Compare Warranty: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex and Shark IONFlex 2X both offer a 5-year limited manufacturer’s warranty while the Dyson V8, Dyson V6, and Dyson V7 come with a 2-year limited warranty.

 


Compare Reviews, Pros and Cons: Shark IONFlex vs Shark IONFlex 2X vs Dyson V8 vs Dyson V6 vs Dyson V7

Shark IONFlex Pros – This vacuum cleaner’s versatile feature helps in transforming it into a hand vacuum and back to an upright cleaner easily. The DuoClean feature is efficient enough for cleaning bare floors and carpets. The design of the wand and its flexibility provides total control for easy maneuverability and even helps reach under furniture with ease. The LED headlight complements the effective cleaning by lighting up the dirt and dust for a better visibility. The 5-year warranty is pretty decent in comparison with other vacuum cleaners.

Shark IONFlex Cons – The problem with Shark IONFlex is that it takes almost 3.5 hours to recharge. It has a small dust cup capacity that requires constant breaks from cleaning cycles to empty it. Also, it isn’t as maneuverable as the Dyson V8 vacuum cleaner.

Shark IONFlex 2X ProsShark IONFlex 2X comes with a simple power button which can be pressed for on or off position, unlike other vacuums that have triggers that needs to be held while using it.



Shark IONFlex 2X Cons – This vacuum works well at lifting up dirt and dust from everything but to use it for cleaning the tops of the curtains can be a little difficult since it is on the heavier side coming in at 7.2 pounds. The brush bar is not removable and as a result, there is no way one can really clean it well. There are strings, strands of hair, and more that can just wrap around the bar and manually clean it when it is still attached can be really frustrating.

Dyson V8 Pros – This vacuum’s cordless feature makes it very convenient to use and its powerful suction works very well to pick up dirt, dust, and pet hair with ease. The vacuum’s capability to go up to 40 minutes of runtime and 25 minutes with motorized floor tool attachment makes it perfect for bigger homes. All one needs to ensure is charge the battery for 4 hours duration before using it. The attachments are pretty easy to use and can be instantly attached and removed with the trigger release. Dyson V8 comes with a HEPA filtration system that captures allergens and expels out only clean air. Its digital motor and direct-drive cleaner head make it one of the most powerful cordless vacuum cleaners. It has 150% more brush bar power over the Dyson V6 model.

Dyson V8 Cons – The vacuum can be a bit heavy when it turns into a handheld one. It may have a powerful motor but its power falls short for rigorous cleaning chores. Another problem is that the runtime for Dyson V8 might be higher but its smaller bin can restrict one-shot use. Its battery also wears out easily and since it requires charging, it is useless if the user doesn’t charge it up prior to use.

Dyson V6 ProsDyson V6 has a long-lasting battery life that ensures thorough cleaning of larger areas. Dyson V6 is designed to work on all types of surface and is lightweight enough for easy portability and maneuverability.

Dyson V6 Cons – This vacuum too has a small bin for storing dust. The portable, lightweight frame isn’t very comfortable while using it in a handheld mode. Compared to other models its suction is less powerful. Since it works on a battery, it isn’t something that can be used right away without checking on the batteries.

Dyson V7 Pros – The cordless and lightweight Dyson V7 offers a decent runtime of approximately 30 minutes to fulfill large cleaning needs. The Motorhead vacuum provides a powerful suction of dirt, dust, debris, and pet hair while being less noisy than the V6 counterpart. It also hosts a allergens filter that captures harmful allergens and throws out clean air that is safe to breathe.

Dyson V7 ConsDyson V7 has a small dust capacity just like other Dyson models and that it isn’t a go-to vacuum since users need to check whether the batteries are charged for using it.

Shift Shop vs T25

Monday, November 6th, 2017


Compare what is it? Shift Shop vs T25

The Shift Shop is a revolutionary rapid-rebuild program that gives you maximum results in just 3 weeks regardless of your age or fitness level.

Focus T25 is a DVD workout program designed to give you a great looking body in just 25 minutes a day. It is designed by Shaun T, the trainer who created the Insanity video workout series. The T25 program is an intense full-body routine, similar to Insanity or P90X where you start with the Alpha phase, which includes five workouts.

 


Compare what to expect? Shift Shop vs T25

Write/Read Reviews

With Shift Shop you might expect to lose about 10 pounds over the course of three weeks, which falls relatively in line with the Centers for Disease Control’s guidelines for healthy weight loss. According to the website, “Individual results vary, but if you follow the nutrition plan and workout calendar every day, you can reach any realistic weight loss goal.”

Week 1 – Shorter 25-minute workouts that help you stay focused and committed, without burning out. With regards to nutrition, you’ll eat a balanced amount of carbs, protein, and fat.

Week 2 – During this week, you will start increasing your intensity and activity level so that you’re working out for 35 minutes each session and fast-tracking your results. You will also cut cutting down starchy carbs and increase your protein and vegetable intake.

Week 3 – During the third week, you will benefit from higher-intensity, 45-minute workouts and healthy eating (more whole, natural foods and less processed ones), giving you a body “that’s significantly faster, stronger, and leaner.” The website claims you’ll be able to “build on these accomplishments for the rest of your life.”

 

T25 workout is fairly easier in comparison with Insanity. Fitness beginners can easily progress to a challenging level, while fitness veterans can get what they want if they simply push themselves as hard as possible (majority of these exercises are body-weight exercises i.e. you use your own body as to supply the resistance. And instead of counting reps, you do as many as you can in 30 seconds or one minute. And for those who need a challenge can push themselves- just try to do one more rep every time.

 


Compare when to Expect Results: Shift Shop vs T25

Shift Shop
After following the three weeks of the Shift Shop Workouts, you are sure to o experience optimal results.

T25
Results vary depending on starting point and effort. Results will be achieved after completing 14 weeks of FOCUS T25. Exercise and proper diet are fundamental to achieve and maintain weight loss and muscle definition.

 


Compare Duration: Shift Shop vs T25

Shift Shop – 3 Weeks.

T25 – 10 Weeks, 25 minutes a day.

 


Compare Method: Shift Shop vs T25

Write/Read Reviews

The Shift Shop employs an innovative “ramp-up” method where you start slowly and then gradually increase the intensity week by week, while refining your nutrition. This is how you make maximum progress in minimal time.

1week- 25min – You start with short cardio and strength workouts you can really do and follow a nutrition plan you can stick with.

2week- 35min – You start pushing a little harder, for a little longer and consume more protein to fuel the burn. But it’s nothing you can’t handle.

3week – 45min – You start a higher intensity workout with 7 days of intense workouts and clean eating.

 

T25
Longer workouts do not necessarily deliver positive results. In fact, major studies show that the first 30 minutes of exercise can be as effective at burning fat as workouts that are twice as long. T25 is a full-body workout in 25 minutes with no rest. Focus Interval Training works every muscle group in your body – one after the other – then it works it again.

25 minutes is all it takes to get ripped abs, lose the baby fat and get the six-pack.

 


Compare Exercises: Shift Shop vs T25

T25
Transformation starts with the Alpha Cycle. Five 25-minute workouts to build your foundation:
• Cardio – 25 minutes of calorie-burning, sweat-drenching cardio.
• Lower Focus – Focus on your lower-body muscles – the key to burning fat.
• Total Body Circuit – Focus on strength and resistance – without lifting a single weight.
• Stretch – 25-minute, muscle-relaxing flexibility routine.
• Speed 1.0 – Fast-paced for fast results.
Then, 5 weeks later ready for the Beta Cycle:
• Core Cardio – This progressive cardio-core workout is about you getting shredded fast.
• Rip’T Circuit Cardio – Works you upper bod, legs, abs and repeat! This is how you get ripped in 25 minutes.
• Dynamic Core – You’ll go from vertical to horizontal and back again in this dynamic, crazy core routine.
• Upper Focus — Shaun will help you develop the upper body of your dreams. All you have to do is FOCUS.
• Speed 2.0 – Rev it all the way up with Shaun’s calorie-scorching, core-focused speed drills.
Plus tools to make every minute count

 


Compare who is it for? Shift Shop vs T25

Write/Read Reviews

Shift Shop
Chris Downing, thr creator of the Shift Shop program, is a personal trainer that takes an engaging, motivation-based approach to help clients increase their physical and mental strength. According to the program’s website, Chris’s results-driven methods can be effective for everyone from beginners to gym rats, using short interval workouts that can deliver results fast.

His personal philosophy is: Love. Empower. Inspire.

In addition to his role at Beachbody, Chris has owned and operated D24 Fitness based in North Canton, OH since 2010. Previously, he attended Alfred University.

 

Focus T25 is a DVD workout series from Shaun T, the trainer who created the Insanity video workout series. His T25 program is an intense full-body routine, similar to Insanity or P90X.

 


Compare Price: Shift Shop vs T25

Shift Shop – 12 months for just $99
T25T25 program for 3 monthly payments of $19.95 (+S&H)

 


Compare Reviews: Shift Shop vs T25


Shift Shop REVIEWS

Jimmy Rose says in his review of the Shift Shop that there is not as much cardio as a few of the others.

Bryan Little who tried the Shift Shop says in his Shift Shop review- “They jump right into combos and it took a few times to keep up. It’s not a set speed where you can follow. Each person is at their speed/comfort level. So it was harder to watch everyone”.

 


T25 REVIEWS

Write/Read Reviews

Victor Mullins states in his T25 review- “There needs to be a guide on how to do the moves because there is no time to learn them during the video. The camera needs to focus where the workout is happening not on the heads and the glamorous bodies shown in the video. The camera moves from person to person way too quick. If your coordination and dance moves are not superior I wouldn’t recommend it. No stretching activities at the beginning show how considerate they are of the actual goals associated with this video”.

Andres Tran is unhappy with the T25 and states in his review- “T25 was not an effective program for me as the high impact exercises created too much stress on my joints”.

Brian Daniels, another user of T25 says in his T25 review- “The music is terrible and there is too much jumping while your arms are doing something totally different”.

Julius Harris complains in his T25 review that the average person cannot do these workouts. He says the exercises are good individually, but the transition from one to the next is messy and there is no explanation of the upcoming exercise until after it has started.

Nicholas Freeman mentions in his T25 review that there are problems with some DVDs playing on his laptop. He says they play partly through the DVD and then freeze, and there is not enough time to figure out each move.